°°°
°°°°°°°
Having failed to provide evidence from primary sources and failed to use ‘the spook card’ in the on-going decades-long DM=AL narrative our information is that the proponents of the equation DM=AL are now venturing into DeepFake (DF) land. Apparently a trial run last year was posted on social media using as a reference an actual photograph from 2014.
Myatt And The O9A: Are Deep Fakes Next?
Extract:
°°°°°°°
°°°
°°°°°°°
Allegations About David Myatt: A Selection Of Texts
° Wikipedia: A Tertiary Source Of Opinions And Allegations.
° Notes On Expiation, Forgiveness, And Implacability.
° Senholt And the Fallacy Of Incomplete Evidence.
° Legality, Allegations, And Mr Myatt.
° Social Media Fun And Games With David Myatt.
° Return Of The Fantasy
° The Peregrinations Of David Myatt: National Socialist Ideologist.
° Diablerie: A Forgery.
° Myatt, A Rural Homeland, And The Pursuit Of The Numinous.
° The Urban Tale Of Myatt And Long.
° Modern Tale Of An Antifascist Propagandist
° In Their Prejudice They Prefer To Prejudge.
° Author Profiling In The Case Of Mr Myatt.
° Antifascist Hate And The Heretical Status Of Mr Myatt.
° Old Accusations.
° An Uncertitude Of Knowing: Four Interviews With David Myatt.
°°°°°°°
°°°°°°°
°°°°°°°
It is no longer surprising, for me and for a minority of others, how many people in this modern technological age:
§ seem to lack the ability to use logical reasoning when writing about or discussing a subject;
§ do not research a subject for themselves using scholarly methodology and primary sources;
§ commit fallacies of reasoning such as appeal to authority and ad populum;
§ use an Internet resource such as ‘wikipedia’ as a source of information about a subject even though it is a tertiary source and thus is based on interpretive secondary sources.
°°°
°°°°°°°
°°°
°°°°°°°
The Internet-based ‘wikipedia’ article about the public figure David Myatt is a good example of why such items, based as they are on secondary and tertiary and not primary sources, are fundamentally flawed with most of those using them as a source of information about a person inadvertently committing the fallacy of reasoning known as appeal to authority.
°°°°°°°
A Tertiary Source Of Opinions And Allegations
°°°°°°°
°°°°°°°
For centuries in the lands of the West, as often elsewhere in the world, the virtue of fairness has been admired with its cultivation in the individual regarded as a necessity for a civilized, cultured, society, based as the virtue was on restrained personal behaviour. The virtue was enshrined in one of the principles of Western jurisprudence: that the burden of proof is on the person who accuses not on the accused. Hence the fairness of the presumption of innocence until probative evidence proves otherwise.
Fairness, Fallacies, And The Cræft Of Research: A Conspectus
°°°°°°°
°°°°°°°
The Fallacy Of Appeal To Authority
(pdf)
The fallacy of appeal to authority, also known as the fallacy of Argumentum ad Verecundiam, is somewhat misunderstood in this age of the Internet. It is not only citing or quoting a person or persons who is the regarded, by the person citing or quoting or by others, as an authority or ‘expert’ on a subject but also citing or quoting the opinion given by some institution, or ‘policy/advisory group’ or similar, on a subject, regardless of whether or not the ‘expert’ or institution or whatever has their opinion published by some means or some medium regarded as ‘mainstream’, academic, or ‘respectable’ or authoritative.
°°°°°°°
The Hebdomian Way 
You must be logged in to post a comment.